Evaluating the color stability of temporary crowns fabricated by 3-dimensional printing and manual methods.

This in vitro study aimed to compare the color stability of temporary crowns fabricated by 3-dimensional (3D) printing with that of crowns fabricated with 2 manual methods. An impression was made of a prepared central incisor, from which 90 dies were fabricated. The dies were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 30) based on crown fabrication method: 3D printing, automix bis-acryl resin, or powder-and-liquid polymethyl methacrylate. All specimens were immersed in a coffee, soft drink, or distilled water solution for 1 week (n = 10 per subgroup). Color change was measured using a spectrophotometer and the International Commission on Illumination's CIE L*a*b* method, and the values were converted to the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) index for assessment and comparison. When color change was assessed according to fabrication method, the highest (mean [SD]) ΔE* value was reported for the automix specimens (3.39 [2.86]), and the lowest was recorded for the powder-and-liquid specimens (2.05 [2.33]) (P < 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test). The difference between ΔE* values of the 3D printing group (2.46 [1.75]) and the powder-and-liquid group was not statistically significant. When color change was assessed according to the immersion solution, the coffee solution showed a significantly higher (mean [SD]) ΔE* value (5.04 [2.67]) than the soft drink (1.43 [0.92]) and distilled water (3.41 [7.93]) solutions (P < 0.05; Kruskal-Wallis test). The color changes associated with the 3 methods were statistically equal in terms of the NBS index ranges, most frequently falling in the range of very minor to acceptable change. The powder-and-liquid method seems to be most suitable for fabricating temporary prostheses for long-term use.

Comparison of the recurrence rate of different surgical techniques for oral mucocele: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis

Background: There are different surgical techniques to remove Oral mucoceles, including conventional surgery with scalpel, removal of the lesion with CO2 laser, and micro marsupialization. The present systematic review was conducted with the aim of comparing the recurrence rate of different surgical techniques for treatment of the oral mucoceles. Material and Methods: An electronic search for randomized controlled trials published in English until September 2022 related to different surgical methods for the treatment of oral mucocele was performed in Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to compare the recurrence rate of different techniques. Results: Among 1204 papers initially identified, after the removal of duplicate articles and screening of the titles and abstracts, fourteen full-text articles were reviewed. Seven articles comparing the recurrence rate of oral mucocele in different surgical techniques were found. Seven studies were included in qualitative studies, and five articles were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of mucocele recurrence in the micro-marsupialization technique was 1.30 times that of the surgical excision with scalpel technique, which was not statistically significant. The risk of mucocele recurrence in the CO2 Laser Vaporization technique was 0.60 times that of the Surgical Excision with Scalpel technique, which was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review showed that there is no significant difference between the recurrence rate of surgical excision, CO2 laser and marsupialization techniques for the treatment of oral mucoceles. Although more randomized clinical trials are needed for definitive results. (AU)

Effectiveness of Bromelain in the control of postoperative pain after periodontal surgery: A crossover randomized clinical trial.

Background: This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of Ibuprofen and bromelain after periodontal surgery. Methods: A double-blinded crossover clinical trial was conducted on 22 patients needing two crown lengthening surgeries without bone surgery or with limited bone surgery on two quadrants of the maxilla, with control and test sides. Each quadrant was randomly assigned to bromelain (500 GUD) or ibuprofen (400 mg). Immediately after the surgery and 6 hours after it, the first dose of the drugs was packaged in the same capsules in A and B. Postoperative pain was evaluated during the first 8 hours and on the following day using a visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Using the VAS, the Ibuprofen group showed significantly lower mean pain scores than the bromelain group at 4 hours (P=0.047). In contrast, there were no significant differences between the two groups at 2, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, and 48 hours (P>0.05). Conclusion: The effectiveness of bromelain for pain control following periodontal surgery was comparable to that of Ibuprofen. Therefore, bromelain can be an efficient replacement for ibuprofen in managing pain after periodontal surgery, especially in patients with gastric ulceration and increased bleeding tendency.